A woman in bright traditional Oaxacan dress dancing among masked huehuentón figures at a Day of the Dead festival.
Day of the Dead at Ojitlán, in the Chinantla — masked huehuentones and a woman in traditional dress. The huehuentón tradition is shared across the peoples of the Sierra Norte.Photo: Fabricio González Soriano · 2018 · Source · CC BY-SA 4.0

Mesoamerica · Culture

Chinantec

Chinantla, northern Oaxaca, Mexico

Documented Living Tradition

A quieter record from Oaxaca: ethnography describes hallucinogenic mushrooms used for diagnosis — finding the cause of an affliction — among highland Chinantec healers.

The people and the landscape

The Chinantec inhabit the Chinantla, a rugged, rain-soaked region of northern Oaxaca neighbouring the Mazatec and Zapotec worlds. Their mushroom record is less famous than the Mazatec one, and that relative quiet is part of its value: it has not been overwritten by decades of tourism and mythology.

Mushrooms for diagnosis

The anchor is Arthur Rubel and Jean Gettelfinger-Krejci’s 1976 study, which describes hallucinogenic mushrooms — identified as Psilocybe hoogshagenii — used for diagnosis among highland Chinantec healers.1 The purpose is not spectacle or transcendence but medical inquiry: finding the cause of an illness so it can be treated. Across Indigenous Mexico, mushrooms are often tools of knowledge before they are anything else.

Footnotes

  1. Rubel & Gettelfinger-Krejci, “The Use of Hallucinogenic Mushrooms for Diagnostic Purposes among Some Highland Chinantecs,” Economic Botany (1976).

Historical record

  1. 1938–39

    Early documentation

    Schultes records Chinantec among the Oaxacan peoples using sacred mushrooms.

    Historical
  2. 1976

    Mushrooms for diagnosis

    Rubel & Gettelfinger-Krejci describe the use of mushrooms identified as Psilocybe hoogshagenii for diagnostic purposes among highland Chinantecs.

    Living tradition

Evidence

The support for this entry, separated by kind. Different kinds of evidence carry different weight.

Contemporary ethnography
Rubel & Gettelfinger-Krejci (1976), a primary ethnographic study of diagnostic use.
Botanical / mycological
Species identification as Psilocybe hoogshagenii.
Firsthand testimony
Healer testimony recorded in the 1970s fieldwork.
◐ Open questions

What remains uncertain

  • The core ethnography dates from the 1970s; present-day continuity is less fully documented in open literature.
  • Mid-century species identifications are not always secure by modern standards.
  • No reliable Chinantec-language name for the mushroom appears in the available sources.

Sources & further reading

  1. Arthur J. Rubel & Jean Gettelfinger-Krejci (1976). The Use of Hallucinogenic Mushrooms for Diagnostic Purposes among Some Highland Chinantecs. Economic Botany 30(3).

    Describes diagnostic use of mushrooms identified as Psilocybe hoogshagenii among contemporary Chinantec healers.

    Peer-reviewed paperPeer-reviewedPaywalled

  2. Richard Evans Schultes (1940). Teonanácatl: The Narcotic Mushroom of the Aztecs. American Anthropologist / Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard.

    The paper that reconnected the colonial word teonanácatl to living Oaxacan mushroom use, drawing on Schultes’ 1938–39 fieldwork among Mazatec, Chinantec, and Zapotec communities.

    Peer-reviewed paperPeer-reviewedArchive scanView source ↗

  3. Gastón Guzmán (2008). Hallucinogenic Mushrooms in Mexico: An Overview. Economic Botany 62(3).

    Species-level overview; identifies P. caerulescens (Nahua teotlaquilnanácatl) among ceremonially used mushrooms and counts Indigenous peoples with recorded use.

    Peer-reviewed paperPeer-reviewedOpen accessView source ↗

  4. Congreso de la Unión (current). Ley General de Salud (arts. 234, 245). Cámara de Diputados, Mexico.

    Lists psilocybin and hallucinogenic mushrooms, including Psilocybe mexicana, as controlled substances.

    Legal / statutory textStatutoryOpen accessView source ↗

Editorial record

Corrections history

No corrections recorded yet. Spotted an error or a mischaracterisation? See how corrections work.

Last reviewed

18 June 2026

Communities and scholars may request amendments or the removal of sensitive material.